A psychometric evaluation of the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale

7Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Gender bias within medical education is gaining increasing attention. However, valid and reliable measures are needed to adequately address and monitor this issue. This research conducts a psychometric evaluation of a short multidimensional scale that assesses medical students' awareness of gender bias, beliefs that gender bias should be addressed, and experience of gender bias during medical education. Methods: Using students from the University of Wollongong, one pilot study and two empirical studies were conducted. The pilot study was used to scope the domain space (n = 28). This initial measure was extended to develop the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale (GBMES). For Study 1 (n = 172), confirmatory factor analysis assessed the construct validity of the three-factor structure (awareness, beliefs, experience) and enabled deletion of redundant items. Study 2 (n = 457) tested the generalizability of the refined scale to a new sample. Combining Study 1 and 2, invariance testing for program of study and gender was explored. The relationship of the GBMES to demographic and gender politics variables was tested. The results were analyzed in R using confirmatory factor analysis and Multiple-Indicator-Multiple-Indicator-Cause models. Results: After analysis of the responses from the original 16-item GBMES (Study 1), a shortened measure of ten items fitted the data well (RMSEA =.063; CFI =.965; TLI =.951; Mean R-square of items = 58.6 %; reliability:.720-.910) and was found to generalize to a new sample in Study 2 (RMSEA =.068; CFI =.952; TLI =.933; Mean R-square of items = 55.9 %; reliability:.711-.892). The GBMES was found to be invariant across studies, gender, and program of study. Female students and those who supported gender equality had greater agreement for each of the factors. Likewise, postgraduate students reported higher scores on experience of gender bias than undergraduate students. Conclusion: The GBMES provides a validated short multidimensional measure for use in research and policy. Given its good reliability across different target populations and its concise length, the GBMES has much potential for application in research and education to assess students' attitudes towards gender bias.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling

18039Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance

12061Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance

8105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Promoting gender in medical and allied health professions education: Influence on students' gender awareness

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gender Bias in Medical Images Affects Students’ Implicit but not Explicit Gender Attitudes

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stigma Surrounding Sexually Transmitted Infections among Medical Students in Germany

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parker, R. B., Parker, P. D., Larkin, T., & Cockburn, J. (2016). A psychometric evaluation of the Gender Bias in Medical Education Scale. BMC Medical Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0774-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

63%

Researcher 7

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

52%

Psychology 12

26%

Social Sciences 7

15%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free