The pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

79Citations
Citations of this article
274Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: To evaluate the evidence for pathologies underlying stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. Methods: For the data sources, a structured search of the peer-reviewed literature (English language; 1960–April 2020) was conducted using predefined key terms in PubMed and Embase. Google Scholar was also searched. Peer-reviewed manuscripts that reported on anatomical, physiological or functional differences between females with signs and/or symptoms consistent with SUI and a concurrently recruited control group of continent females without any substantive urogynecological symptoms. Of 4629 publications screened, 84 met the inclusion criteria and were retained, among which 24 were included in meta-analyses. Results: Selection bias was moderate to high; < 25% of studies controlled for major confounding variables for SUI (e.g., age, BMI and parity). There was a lack of standardization of methods among studies, and several measurement issues were identified. Results were synthesized qualitatively, and, where possible, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Deficits in urethral and bladder neck structure and support, neuromuscular and mechanical function of the striated urethral sphincter (SUS) and levator ani muscles all appear to be associated with SUI. Meta-analyses showed that observed bladder neck dilation and lower functional urethral length, bladder neck support and maximum urethral closure pressures are strong characteristic signs of SUI. Conclusion: The pathology of SUI is multifactorial, with strong evidence pointing to bladder neck and urethral incompetence. While there is also evidence of impaired urethral support and levator ani function, standardized approaches to measurement are needed to generate higher levels of evidence.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53902Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

27201Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

26142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Urethral function and failure: A review of current knowledge of urethral closure mechanisms, how they vary, and how they are affected by life events

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Anatomical Pathogenesis of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A nomogram model predicting the risk of postpartum stress urinary incontinence in primiparas: A multicenter study

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Falah-Hassani, K., Reeves, J., Shiri, R., Hickling, D., & McLean, L. (2021, March 1). The pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Urogynecology Journal. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04622-9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 41

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

12%

Researcher 7

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 41

49%

Medicine and Dentistry 31

37%

Sports and Recreations 7

8%

Engineering 5

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free