Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: The good, the bad, and the ugly

5.0kCitations
Citations of this article
1.2kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Nitric oxide contrasts with most intercellular messengers because it diffuses rapidly and isotropically through most tissues with little reaction but cannot be transported through the vasculature due to rapid destruction by oxyhemoglobin. The rapid diffusion of nitric oxide between cells allows it to locally integrate the responses of blood vessels to turbulence, modulate synaptic plasticity in neurons, and control the oscillatory behavior of neuronal networks. Nitric oxide is not necessarily short lived and is intrinsically no more reactive than oxygen. The reactivity of nitric oxide per se has been greatly overestimated in vitro, because no drain is provided to remove nitric oxide. Nitric oxide persists in solution for several minutes in micromolar concentrations before it reacts with oxygen to form much stronger oxidants like nitrogen dioxide. Nitric oxide is removed within seconds in vivo by diffusion over 100 μm through tissues to enter red blood cells and react with oxyhemoglobin. The direct toxicity of nitric oxide is modest but is greatly enhanced by reacting with superoxide to form peroxynitrite (ONOO-). Nitric oxide is the only biological molecule produced in high enough concentrations to out-compete superoxide dismutase for superoxide. Peroxynitrite reacts relatively slowly with most biological molecules, making peroxynitrite a selective oxidant. Peroxynitrite modifies tyrosine in proteins to create nitrotyrosines, leaving a footprint detectable in vivo. Nitration of structural proteins, including neurofilaments and actin, can disrupt filament assembly with major pathological consequences. Antibodies to nitrotyrosine have revealed nitration in human atherosclerosis, myocardial ischemia, septic and distressed lung, inflammatory bowel disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

4058Citations
3247Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beckman, J. S., & Koppenol, W. H. (1996). Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: The good, the bad, and the ugly. American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology. American Physiological Society. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1996.271.5.c1424

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2404080120160

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 521

64%

Researcher 157

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 106

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 29

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 241

35%

Medicine and Dentistry 184

27%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 164

24%

Chemistry 100

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 3
News Mentions: 7
References: 4
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 159

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0