Exploring the Adult Learning Research Field by Analysing Who Cites Whom

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article we report on findings from a large-scale bibliographic study conducted based on the citation practices within the field of research on adult learning. Our data consist of 151,261 citation links between more than 33,000 different authors whose papers were published in five leading international journals in the field of adult learning during the time period 2006–2014. By analysing the composition of the dominating citation clusters we are able to construct a telescopic view of the research field based on an accumulation of bibliographic citations. The results consist of two parts. First we go through the dominating players active in the field, their position and mutual relationship. Secondly, we derive two main structural oppositions inherent in the citation networks, one connected to the research object (studying education or work) and the second to the level of analysis (cognition or policy). We find that the most dominating tradition within adult learning the last few decades – socio- cultural perspectives on learning – occupies a very central position in the space of citations, balancing between these opposing poles. We hope that this analysis will help foster reflexivity concerning our own research practices, and will reveal the relations of dominance currently prevailing within the field of adult learning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nylander, E., Österlund, L., & Fejes, A. (2019). Exploring the Adult Learning Research Field by Analysing Who Cites Whom. In Lifelong Learning Book Series (Vol. 24, pp. 55–72). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10946-2_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free