Evaluation of video-based rPPG in challenging environments: Artifact mitigation and network resilience

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Video-based remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) has emerged as a promising technology for non-contact vital sign monitoring, especially under controlled conditions. However, the accurate measurement of vital signs in real-world scenarios faces several challenges, including artifacts induced by videocodecs, low-light noise, degradation, low dynamic range, occlusions, and hardware and network constraints. In this article, a systematic and comprehensive investigation of these issues is conducted, measuring their detrimental effects on the quality of rPPG measurements. Additionally, practical strategies are proposed for mitigating these challenges to improve the dependability and resilience of video-based rPPG systems. Methods for effective biosignal recovery in the presence of network limitations are detailed, along with denoising and inpainting techniques aimed at preserving video frame integrity. Compared to previous studies, this paper addresses a broader range of variables and demonstrates improved accuracy across various rPPG methods, emphasizing generalizability for practical applications in diverse scenarios with varying data quality. Extensive evaluations and direct comparisons demonstrate the effectiveness of these approaches in enhancing rPPG measurements under challenging environments, contributing to the development of more reliable and effective remote vital sign monitoring technologies.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nguyen, N., Nguyen, L., Li, H., Bordallo López, M., & Álvarez Casado, C. (2024). Evaluation of video-based rPPG in challenging environments: Artifact mitigation and network resilience. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108873

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 4

67%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

50%

Engineering 1

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free