On mistakes we made in prior computational psychiatry data driven approach projects and how they jeopardize translation of those findings in clinical practice

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this work, we aimed at comparing our findings in depression detection task with similar methodologies applied in present literature. In our project we showed that when electrophysiological signal (in this case electroencephalogram, EEG) is characterized by nonlinear measures, any of seven most popular classifiers yields high accuracy on the task. Following every step done in this process we elaborated on other findings mainly from analysis of electrical signals or nonlinear analysis showing what would be optimal for further research. We focused on discussing various possible mistakes and differences that could potentially lead to unwarranted optimism and other misinterpretations of results. We also consider obstacles that this practice would be accepted for real-life application in psychiatry and some ideas how to overcome them. In Conclusion we summarize recommendation for future research in order to be easily applicable in clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Čukić, M., Pokrajac, D., & Lopez, V. (2021). On mistakes we made in prior computational psychiatry data driven approach projects and how they jeopardize translation of those findings in clinical practice. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1252 AISC, pp. 493–510). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55190-2_37

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free