RRegrs: An R package for computer-aided model selection with multiple regression models

45Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Predictive regression models can be created with many different modelling approaches. Choices need to be made for data set splitting, cross-validation methods, specific regression parameters and best model criteria, as they all affect the accuracy and efficiency of the produced predictive models, and therefore, raising model reproducibility and comparison issues. Cheminformatics and bioinformatics are extensively using predictive modelling and exhibit a need for standardization of these methodologies in order to assist model selection and speed up the process of predictive model development. A tool accessible to all users, irrespectively of their statistical knowledge, would be valuable if it tests several simple and complex regression models and validation schemes, produce unified reports, and offer the option to be integrated into more extensive studies. Additionally, such methodology should be implemented as a free programming package, in order to be continuously adapted and redistributed by others. Results: We propose an integrated framework for creating multiple regression models, called RRegrs. The tool offers the option of ten simple and complex regression methods combined with repeated 10-fold and leave-one-out cross-validation. Methods include Multiple Linear regression, Generalized Linear Model with Stepwise Feature Selection, Partial Least Squares regression, Lasso regression, and Support Vector Machines Recursive Feature Elimination. The new framework is an automated fully validated procedure which produces standardized reports to quickly oversee the impact of choices in modelling algorithms and assess the model and cross-validation results. The methodology was implemented as an open source R package, available at https://www.github.com/enanomapper/RRegrs, by reusing and extending on the caret package. Conclusion: The universality of the new methodology is demonstrated using five standard data sets from different scientific fields. Its efficiency in cheminformatics and QSAR modelling is shown with three use cases: proteomics data for surface-modified gold nanoparticles, nano-metal oxides descriptor data, and molecular descriptors for acute aquatic toxicity data. The results show that for all data sets RRegrs reports models with equal or better performance for both training and test sets than those reported in the original publications. Its good performance as well as its adaptability in terms of parameter optimization could make RRegrs a popular framework to assist the initial exploration of predictive models, and with that, the design of more comprehensive in silico screening applications. Graphical abstract RRegrs is a computer-aided model selection framework for R multiple regression models; this is a fully validated procedure with application to QSAR modelling.

References Powered by Scopus

Random forests

96163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso

36016Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net

13235Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Towards reproducible computational drug discovery

139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

NanoSolveIT Project: Driving nanoinformatics research to develop innovative and integrated tools for in silico nanosafety assessment

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Practices and trends of machine learning application in nanotoxicology

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsiliki, G., Munteanu, C. R., Seoane, J. A., Fernandez-Lozano, C., Sarimveis, H., & Willighagen, E. L. (2015). RRegrs: An R package for computer-aided model selection with multiple regression models. Journal of Cheminformatics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-015-0094-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

47%

Researcher 25

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 19

38%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14

28%

Engineering 10

20%

Chemistry 7

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 140

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free