The application of multi-attribute utility theory for a market share-based design evaluation

8Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to use the concepts of the multi-attribute utility theory to develop a model to evaluate the design of low-density residential units to increase the profit of the company from a certain design, by assessing the changes in the market shares as a result of the built unit’s attributes. Design/methodology/approach: The proposed platform consists of two stages: Stage I or relational model development and Stage II or design evaluation. Stage I is concerned with developing a mathematical model that links design variables (e.g. the R-Value of the building envelope and construction material) with the assessment attributes (e.g. price and carbon emissions). Stage II ensures the fulfillment of the corporation’s goals in maximizing profit and market shares using multi-attribute utility theory. Findings: The application of the proposed model on a case study – a single-family house – shows that reducing the selling price of the unit is not always the best marketing strategy builders should pursue to increase their sales and accordingly their profit, as accounting for other attributes (e.g. performance, operational cost and environmental impact) leads to larger changes in the market shares and accordingly in profit. Research limitations/implications: The limitations of this research are manifested in the following points: it does not account for the impact of the marketing campaigns on the market shares; it considers the profit as a percentage of the construction cost; and it has not been validated on high-density residential buildings. Practical implications: This research provides speculative builders with a platform that allows the objective evaluation of houses’ designs prior to introducing them to the market so builders can increase their market shares and consequently their profit. The proposed platform also contributes to increasing the sustainable performance of the housing industry, as it allows for the assessment of the design against economic, environmental and social attributes concurrently, which ensures a balanced consideration of the built houses on sustainability pillars. Social implications: The proposed platform for design evaluation extends the assessment attributes beyond the traditionally considered economic and environmental attributes. By doing so, it assists decision-makers in evaluating the potential social influence of the proposed design and, as a result, reduces the unwanted impact. Originality/value: This research combines the concepts of multi-attribute utility with market studies to develop an objective decision support tool for evaluating the design of speculative houses to increase the sustainable performance of the builders without compromising on their profit.

References Powered by Scopus

A theory of anticipated utility

1822Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion?

606Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing the potential demand for electric cars

551Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Generative systems in the architecture, engineering and construction industry: A systematic review and analysis

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dealing with the eco-design paradox in research and development projects: The concept of sustainability assessment levels

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Drivers of housing purchasing decisions: a data-driven analysis

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

BuHamdan, S., Alwisy, A., Bouferguene, A., & Al-Hussein, M. (2019). The application of multi-attribute utility theory for a market share-based design evaluation. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 12(6), 985–1003. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-11-2018-0087

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

57%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

17%

Researcher 4

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 10

56%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

22%

Design 2

11%

Computer Science 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free