The consequences of disclosing key audit matters (KAMs): A review of the academic literature

  • Gold A
  • Heilmann M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
175Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a change in the auditor reporting model. One of these developments is the auditor’s issuance of so-called Key Audit Matters in the auditor’s report, where they disclose “those matters that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period”. In this paper, we review the emerging body of academic research which examines the effects of KAM disclosures in the auditor’s report. We investigate research that has examined the effect of KAM disclosures on (1) investor behavior and market reaction, (2) auditor responses, (3) auditor liability, and (4) client management responses. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the existing literature and to summarize the preliminary findings and implications of 22 studies.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gold, A., & Heilmann, M. (2019). The consequences of disclosing key audit matters (KAMs): A review of the academic literature. Maandblad Voor Accountancy En Bedrijfseconomie, 93(1/2), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.93.29496

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 33

58%

Lecturer / Post doc 16

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Researcher 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 42

69%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16

26%

Social Sciences 2

3%

Computer Science 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0