Invisible impairments: Dilemmas of concealment and disclosure

69Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

People with invisible impairments have choices as whether or not to reveal or conceal their impairments in social interaction. They may pass for “normal” if they silence impairment and disability experiences. Social conventions support silence. Disclosing impairments may occur in many circumstances, for many reasons and may have many ramifications. People with invisible impairments and the dilemmas they face have received little attention in disability research. This article discusses concealment and disclosure of invisible impairments as ongoing processes with an emphasis on performance, motivation and context. © 2008 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

References Powered by Scopus

The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach

2109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Narrating the self

824Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Politics of Physical Differences: Disability and Discrimination

243Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes

602Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The use and non-use of assistive technologies from the world of information and communication technology by visually impaired young people: A walk on the tightrope of peer inclusion

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Experiences of Microaggressions against Women with Visible and Invisible Disabilities

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lingsom, S. (2008). Invisible impairments: Dilemmas of concealment and disclosure. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 10(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410701391567

Readers over time

‘09‘12‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

11%

Researcher 5

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 24

51%

Psychology 12

26%

Arts and Humanities 7

15%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0