Sovereign Wealth Funds in Theory and Practice

7Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Are natural resources a curse or a blessing? The answer may depend on how natural wealth is managed. By transforming a temporary windfall into a permanent stock in the form of a sovereign wealth fund, resource-rich economies can avoid volatility and Dutch disease effects, save for future generations, and invest locally. We review the theory behind these resource funds and explore the empirical evidence for their success. Our review is complemented by case studies that highlight some of the more nuanced features, behavior, and effects of resource funds. While the theoretical research highlights the situational success of funds, empirical examinations are minimal. We discuss possible reasons for this gap in the literature and, in doing so, highlight some of the challenges associated with empirical research in this area and discuss possible paths forward.

References Powered by Scopus

PORTFOLIO SELECTION

16702Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK

9684Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The curse of natural resources

2373Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How natural resource rents, exports, and government resource revenues determine Genuine Savings: Causal evidence from oil, gas, and coal

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why do some natural resource-rich countries adopt prudent fiscal rules? An empirical analysis

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Natural resource fund governance and the institutionalization of rent seeking in Nigeria's oil sector

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

James, A., Retting, T., Shogren, J. F., Watson, B., & Wills, S. (2022). Sovereign Wealth Funds in Theory and Practice. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 14, 621–646. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-111920-015758

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

40%

Researcher 6

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

33%

Social Sciences 3

20%

Environmental Science 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0