Redefining the Status of Occupations

  • Heinz W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the past thirty years we have seen waves of re-assessments carried out on the world of work in the wake of the declining industrial society: the degradation of work (Braverman, 1974) was prominent in the 1970s; the end of the division of labour and the upgrading of work (Kern & Schumann, 1984) in the 1980s; the end of work (Rifkin, 1995) in the 1990s; and the end of the career (Moen & Roehling, 2005) at the turn of the century. Will we witness the end of the term ‘occupation’ in the years to come? While Rifkin (1995) propagated the decline of the labour force on a global scale in the post-market era, as the consequence of massive job cuts in production and marketing of goods and services, Moen & Roehling (2005) argue that the lock-step pattern of career is dissolving, that it never existed for women and is becoming less and less the employment pattern of men.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heinz, W. R. (2009). Redefining the Status of Occupations. In International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work (pp. 161–173). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5281-1_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free