What are we weighting for?

827Citations
Citations of this article
973Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When estimating population descriptive statistics, weighting is called for if needed to make the analysis sample representative of the target population. With regard to research directed instead at estimating causal effects, we discuss three distinct weighting motives: (1) to achieve precise estimates by correcting for heteroskedasticity; (2) to achieve consistent estimates by correcting for endogenous sampling; and (3) to identify average partial effects in the presence of unmodeled heterogeneity of effects. In each case, we fi nd that the motive sometimes does not apply in situations where practitioners often assume it does.

References Powered by Scopus

Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed

1997Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market?

1234Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The labor demand curve is downward sloping: Reexamining the impact of immigration on the labor market

1198Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing

2564Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research

969Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth

487Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Solon, G., Haider, S. J., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). What are we weighting for? Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.301

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2504080120160

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 532

70%

Researcher 120

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 88

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 21

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 400

63%

Social Sciences 195

30%

Medicine and Dentistry 27

4%

Psychology 18

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 22

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0