The changing food outlet distributions and local contextual factors in the United States

15Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the dynamics of the food outlet distributions associated with local contextual factors in the U.S. This study examines the changes in food stores/services at the 5-digit Zip Code Tabulated Area (ZCTA5) level in the U.S., and assesses contextual factors associated with the changes. Methods. Data from 27,878 ZCTA5s in the contiguous United States without an extreme change in the number of 6 types of food stores/services (supermarkets, small-size grocery stores, convenience stores, fresh/specialty food markets, carry-out restaurants, and full-service restaurants) were used. ZCTA5s' contextual factors were from the 2000 Census. Numbers of food stores/services were derived from the Census Business Pattern databases. Linear regression models assessed contextual factors' influences (racial/ethnic compositions, poverty rate, urbanization level, and foreign-born population%) on 1-year changes in food stores/services during 2000-2001, adjusted for population size, total business change, and census regions. Results: Small-size grocery stores and fresh/specialty food markets increased more and convenience stores decreased more in Hispanic-predominant than other areas. Among supermarket-free places, new supermarkets were less likely to be introduced into black-predominant than white-predominant areas (odds ratio (OR) = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.30-0.92). However, among areas without the following type of store at baseline, supermarket (OR = 0.48 (0.33-0.70)), small-size grocery stores (OR = 1.32 (1.08-1.62)), and fresh/specialty food markets (OR = 0.70 (0.53-0.92)) were less likely to be introduced into areas of low foreign-born population than into areas of high foreign-born population. Higher poverty rate was associated with a greater decrease in supermarket, a less decrease in small-size grocery stores, and a less increase in carry-out restaurants (all p for trends <0.001). Urban areas experienced more increases in full-service and carry-out restaurants than suburban areas. Conclusions: Local area characteristics affect 1-year changes in food environment in the U.S. Hispanic population was associated with more food stores/services capable of supplying fresh food items. Black-predominant and poverty-afflicted areas had a greater decrease in supermarkets. Full-service and carry-out restaurants increased more in urban than suburban areas. Foreign-born population density was associated with introduction of grocery stores and fresh/specialty food markets into the areas. © 2014 Chen and Wang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Neighborhood Environments. Disparities in Access to Healthy Foods in the U.S.

1536Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The contextual effect of the local food environment on residents' diets: The atherosclerosis risk in communities study

1026Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Supermarkets, other food stores, and obesity: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

812Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Measures of the food environment: A systematic review of the field, 2007–2015

221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Food insecurity, food "deserts," and glycemic control in patients with diabetes: A longitudinal analysis

142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identifying food deserts and swamps based on relative healthy food access: A spatio-temporal Bayesian approach

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, H. J., & Wang, Y. (2014). The changing food outlet distributions and local contextual factors in the United States. BMC Public Health, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-42

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

72%

Researcher 5

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 14

39%

Medicine and Dentistry 9

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0