Locking and Unlocking: The Potentialities for Intra-Storying-Activism in “This” Baglady Collective

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article we disrupt extractivist and privileged individualised knowledge production by decentering the human ‘I’ to ‘we’ through storying. Inspired by Le Guin (2019) and Haraway’s (2016) narrative baglady figuration, we explore a Baglady storytelling praxis. This means putting to work posthuman theories with the more-than-human, where knowledge-making is generated through the intra-actions of our collective’s storying. Starting with the provocation of locking and unlocking, we story to make sense of political and ethical affectivities that disrupt and interrupt everyday materialities and spatialities. From here, we speculate with movements of response-ability as “intra-activism” (Renold & Ringrose, 2017, 631). For us, storying puts in motion intra-action, speculation, calls to act, relationality, and feminist community building that we frame as intra-storying-activism. Making and re-making stories with intra-storying-activism navigates non-hierarchical post-authorship to re-imagine, speculate-with and trouble the human from extractivist positions. By foregrounding relationality as a multiplying storying, we create playful, dynamic, and generative spaces for knowledge making as a collective that both welcomes and provokes calls to act.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baglady, Albin-Clark, J., Ovington, J., Isom, P., Platt, L., Harding, L., … Smith, S. (2023). Locking and Unlocking: The Potentialities for Intra-Storying-Activism in “This” Baglady Collective. Journal of Posthumanism, 3(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.33182/joph.v3i3.3015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free