Alternative solution for ex vivo lung perfusion, experimental study on donated human lungs non-accepted for transplantation

8Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate a new perfusate solution to be used for ex vivo lung perfusion.Methods: Randomized experimental study using lungs from rejected brain-dead donors harvested and submitted to 1 hour of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) using mainstream solution or the alternative.Results: From 16 lungs blocs tested, we found no difference on weight after EVLP: Steen group (SG) = 1,097±526g; Alternative Perfusion Solution (APS) = 743±248g, p=0.163. Edema formation, assessed by Wet/dry weigh ratio, was statistically higher on the Alternative Perfusion Solution group (APS = 3.63 ± 1.26; SG = 2.06 ± 0.28; p = 0.009). No difference on PaO2 after EVLP (SG = 498±37.53mmHg; APS = 521±55.43mmHg, p=0.348, nor on histological analyses: pulmonary injury score: SG = 4.38±1.51; APS = 4.50±1.77, p=0.881; apoptotic cells count after perfusion: SG = 2.4 ± 2.0 cells/mm2; APS = 4.8 ± 6.9 cells/mm2; p = 0.361).Conclusion: The ex vivo lung perfusion using the alternative perfusion solution showed no functional or histological differences, except for a higher edema formation, from the EVLP using Steen Solution® on lungs from rejected brain-dead donors.

References Powered by Scopus

Ischemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury.

825Citations
235Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Technique for Prolonged Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion

428Citations
241Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernandes, L. M., Mariani, A. W., De Medeiros, I. L., Samano, M. N., Abdalla, L. G., Correia, A. T., … Pêgo-Fernandes, P. M. (2015). Alternative solution for ex vivo lung perfusion, experimental study on donated human lungs non-accepted for transplantation. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, 30(5), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-865020150050000008

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

64%

Researcher 7

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 27

87%

Engineering 2

6%

Design 1

3%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0