Cognitive Effects Following Offline High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (HF-rTMS) in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

16Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) is a commonly used form of rTMS to treat neuropsychiatric disorders. Emerging evidence suggests that ‘offline’ HF-rTMS may have cognitive enhancing effects, although the magnitude and moderators of these effects remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the cognitive effects of offline HF-rTMS in healthy individuals. A literature search for randomised controlled trials with cognitive outcomes for pre and post offline HF-rTMS was performed across five databases up until March 2022. This study was registered on the PROSPERO international prospective protocol for systematic reviews (PROSPERO 2020 CRD 42,020,191,269). The Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias in randomised trials. Separate analyses examined the cognitive effects of excitatory and inhibitory forms of offline HF-rTMS on accuracy and reaction times across six cognitive domains. Fifty-three studies (N = 1507) met inclusion criteria. Excitatory offline HF-rTMS showed significant small sized effects for improving accuracy (k = 46, g = 0.12) and reaction time (k = 44, g = -0.13) across all cognitive domains collapsed. Excitatory offline HF-rTMS demonstrated a relatively greater effect for executive functioning in accuracy (k = 24, g = 0.14). Reaction times were also improved for the executive function (k = 21, g = -0.11) and motor (k = 3, g = -0.22) domains following excitatory offline HF-rTMS. The current review was restricted to healthy individuals and future research is required to examine cognitive enhancement from offline HF-rTMS in clinical cohorts.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

49367Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

43258Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions

37301Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Combined with Psychological Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A pilot study to examine the association between COX-2 rs5275 polymorphism and the response to repetitive transcranial stimulation in schizophrenia

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Individualised Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Targeting of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Enhancing Cognition: A Randomised Controlled Trial

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, M., Nikolin, S., Samaratunga, N., Chow, E. J. H., Loo, C. K., & Martin, D. M. (2024, March 1). Cognitive Effects Following Offline High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (HF-rTMS) in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neuropsychology Review. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09580-9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Researcher 4

36%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 8

67%

Engineering 2

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

8%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free