Challenges and progress in the understanding and modelling of the wheel–rail creep forces

54Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper surveys advances in the understanding and modelling of wheel–rail creep forces. The main focus is placed on tribological aspects, for which significant progress was made in the past two decades. We emphasise the role played by the surface conditions, i.e. the presence of liquid and solid layers, surface roughness, and near-surface plastic deformation. As these surface conditions may change over time, transient changes may be obtained in the creep force characteristic. This brings feedback into the picture, with consequences and opportunities for optimised adhesion recovery, traction control, and braking systems.

References Powered by Scopus

A Fast Algorithm for the Simplified Theory of Rolling Contact

1035Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Creep forces in simulations of traction vehicles running on adhesion limit

525Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Comparison of Alternative Creep Force Models for Rail Vehicle Dynamic Analysis

326Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Freight train air brake models

84Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prediction of rail surface damage in locomotive traction operations using laboratory-field measured and calibrated data

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Formation mechanism of metro rail corrugation based on wheel–rail stick–slip behaviors

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vollebregt, E., Six, K., & Polach, O. (2021). Challenges and progress in the understanding and modelling of the wheel–rail creep forces. Vehicle System Dynamics, 59(7), 1026–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2021.1912367

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

66%

Researcher 7

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 22

81%

Computer Science 2

7%

Arts and Humanities 2

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free