Experiences of the implementation of a tool for lifestyle intervention in primary health care: A qualitative study among managers and professional groups

11Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In recent years there has been increasing interest in transferring new knowledge into health care practices, a process often referred to as implementation. The various subcultures that exist among health care workers may be an obstacle in this process. The aim of this study was to explore how professional groups and managers experienced the implementation of a new tool for lifestyle intervention in primary health care (PHC). The computer-based tool was introduced with the intention of facilitating the delivery of preventive services. Methods. Focus group interviews with staff and individual interviews with managers at six PHC units in the southeast of Sweden were performed 9 months after the introduction of the new working tool. Staff interviews were conducted in groups according to profession, and were analysed using manifest content analysis. Experiences and opinions from the different staff groups and from managers were analysed. Results: Implementation preconditions, opinions about the lifestyle test, and opinions about usage were the main areas identified. In each of the groups, managers and professionals, factors related to the existing subcultures seemed to influence their experiences of the implementation. Managers were visionary, GPs were reluctant, nurses were open, and nurse assistants were indifferent. Conclusion: This study indicates that the existing subcultures in PHC influence how the implementation of an innovation is perceived by managers and the different professionals. In PHC, an organization with several subcultures and an established hierarchical structure, an implementation strategy aimed at all groups did not seem to result in a successful uptake of the new method. © 2011 Carlfjord et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness

13379Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education

1021Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions

960Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The role of ICT in nursing practice: an integrative literature review of the Swedish context

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Primary prevention in general practice - Views of German general practitioners: A mixed-methods study

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in Swedish primary healthcare - a two-year follow up

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carlfjord, S., Andersson, A., & Lindberg, M. (2011). Experiences of the implementation of a tool for lifestyle intervention in primary health care: A qualitative study among managers and professional groups. BMC Health Services Research, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-195

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

71%

Researcher 4

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 16

53%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

20%

Psychology 6

20%

Social Sciences 2

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1929

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free