Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

  • Patel M
  • Mahaffey K
  • et al.
8.2kCitations
Citations of this article
3.2kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin. METHODS In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 14,264 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk for stroke to receive either rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The per-protocol, as-treated primary analysis was designed to determine whether rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism. RESULTS In the primary analysis, the primary end point occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority). Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group (14.9% per year) and in 1449 in the warfarin group (14.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44), with significant reductions in intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P=0.02) and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.003) in the rivaroxaban group. CONCLUSIONS In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767.).

References Powered by Scopus

Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

9828Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: The framingham study

6363Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-analysis: Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

4193Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure

10914Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

7765Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

7703Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, M. R., Mahaffey, K. W., Garg, J., Pan, G., Singer, D. E., … Califf, R. M. (2011). Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine, 365(10), 883–891. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1009638

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1084

62%

Researcher 403

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 189

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 72

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1638

82%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 227

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84

4%

Nursing and Health Professions 50

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 7
News Mentions: 34
References: 5
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 187

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free