Wait time from primary to specialty care: A trend analysis from Edmonton, Canada

13Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Medical wait time is a top health policy issue in Canada. Reliable data on the referral wait time from primary to specialty care are limited. Existing data on referral wait times are generally self-reported by specialists. In 2008, the Edmonton North Primary Care Network (PCN) developed a Centralized Referral Program, including a specialist database that contains information on specialists' referral requirements, forms and protocols, and has the capability of tracking referrals that the PCN makes on behalf of its family physicians to specialty care. We performed a trend analysis of the referral wait time (defined as the time from referral by a family physician to an appointment date with a specialist) from 2009 to 2011 using the program database (n=33,281 referrals). The study provided a unique and comprehensive picture of wait times for 22 specialties. We identified a decrease in the overall wait time year over year, and improvement in the number of referrals that are accepted the first time. Additionally, specific opportunities for further improvement in referral wait time were noted.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Understanding patient referral wait times for specialty care in Ontario: A retrospective chart audit

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: Cross-sectional analysis

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Primary care physician referral patterns in Ontario, Canada: A descriptive analysis of self-reported referral data

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thanh, N. X., Wanke, M., & McGeachy, L. (2013). Wait time from primary to specialty care: A trend analysis from Edmonton, Canada. Healthcare Policy, 8(4), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2013.23375

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

47%

Researcher 7

37%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

80%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

10%

Computer Science 1

5%

Social Sciences 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0