Corn stalk orientation effect on mechanical cutting

118Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Research efforts that increase the efficiency of size reduction of biomass can lead to a significant energy saving. This paper deals with the determination of the effect of sample orientation with respect to cutting element and quantify the possible cutting energy reduction, utilising dry corn stalks as the test material (15%-20% wet basis). To evaluate the mechanical cutting characteristics of corn stalks, a Warner-Bratzler device was modified by replacing its blunt edged cutting element with one having a 30° single bevel sharp knife edge. Cutting force-deformation characteristics obtained with a universal testing machine were analysed to evaluate the orientation effects at perpendicular (90°), inclined (45°), and parallel (0°) orientations on internodes and nodes for cutting force, energy, ultimate stress, and specific energy of corn stalks. The corn stalks cutting force-displacement characteristics were found to differ with orientation, and internode and node material difference. Overall, the peak failure force, and the total cutting energy of internodes and nodes varied significantly (P < 0.05) with stalk cross-sectional area. The specific energy values (total energy per unit cut area) of dry corn stalk internodes ranged from 11.3 to 23.5 kN m-1, and nodes from 8.6 to 14.0 kN m-1. The parallel orientation (along grain) compared to perpendicular (across grain) produced a significant reduction of the cutting stress and the specific energy to one-tenth or better for internodes, and to about one-fifth for nodes. © 2010.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Igathinathane, C., Womac, A. R., & Sokhansanj, S. (2010). Corn stalk orientation effect on mechanical cutting. Biosystems Engineering, 107(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.07.005

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

56%

Researcher 7

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 16

52%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12

39%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

6%

Decision Sciences 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free