Psychometric evaluation and invariance of the Spanish version of the Block Fat Screener (BFS-E) in university students

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: University students constantly face a number of health challenges related to an unhealthy diet, characterized by a high intake of saturated fats. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Block Fat Screener (BFS-E) food frequency questionnaire in a university population. Methods: An observational analytical study of instrumental type was carried out in 5608 Peruvian university students. Based on the Block Fat Screener questionnaire, a back-translation and cultural adaptation process was carried out. The validity of the questionnaire was determined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), hypothesizing a unidimensional structure. For the determination of reliability, the alpha coefficients were considered; likewise, the ω and H coefficients were used to evaluate the construct. The model explained 63% of the cumulative variance. Results: The CFA confirmed the unidimensionality of the 16-item questionnaire with appropriate goodness-of-fit indicators; therefore, which model of the Peruvian version adequately fits the observed data. The values of the reliability coefficients were higher than 0.90, with ordinal α = 0.94, ω = 0.94, and H = 0.95. Conclusion: The Spanish version of the Block Fat Screener food frequency questionnaire presents adequate psychometric properties and is therefore a valid scale to quickly measure fat intake in university students in a Latin American context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saintila, J., Morales-García, W. C., Calizaya-Milla, Y. E., Ruiz Mamani, P. G., Huancahuire-Vega, S., Calizaya-Milla, S. E., & Ramos-Vera, C. (2023). Psychometric evaluation and invariance of the Spanish version of the Block Fat Screener (BFS-E) in university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1055468

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free