Should studies of diabetes treatment stratification correct for baseline HbA1c?

26Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: Baseline HbA1c is a major predictor of response to glucose lowering therapy and therefore a potential confounder in studies aiming to identify other predictors. However, baseline adjustment may introduce error if the association between baseline HbA1c and response is substantially due to measurement error and regression to the mean. We aimed to determine whether studies of predictors of response should adjust for baseline HbA1c. Methods: We assessed the relationship between baseline HbA1c and glycaemic response in 257 participants treated with GLP-1R agonists and assessed whether it reflected measurement error and regression to the mean using duplicate 'pre-baseline' HbA1c measurements not included in the response variable. In this cohort and an additional 2659 participants treated with sulfonylureas we assessed the relationship between covariates associated with baseline HbA1c and treatment response with and without baseline adjustment, and with a bias correction using pre-baseline HbA1c to adjust for the effects of error in baseline HbA1c. Results: Baseline HbA1c was a major predictor of response (R2 = 0.19,β = -0.44,p<0.001).The association between pre-baseline and response was similar suggesting the greater response at higher baseline HbA1cs is not mainly due to measurement error and subsequent regression to the mean. In unadjusted analysis in both cohorts, factors associated with baseline HbA1c were associated with response, however these associations were weak or absent after adjustment for baseline HbA1c. Bias correction did not substantially alter associations. Conclusions: Adjustment for the baseline HbA1c measurement is a simple and effective way to reduce bias in studies of predictors of response to glucose lowering therapy.

References Powered by Scopus

Regression to the mean: What it is and how to deal with it

1444Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Switching from insulin to oral sulfonylureas in patients with diabetes due to Kir6.2 mutations

868Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

When is baseline adjustment useful in analyses of change? An example with education and cognitive change

558Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sex and BMI alter the benefits and risks of sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones in type 2 diabetes: A framework for evaluating stratification using routine clinical and individual trial data

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Precision medicine in type 2 diabetes: Using individualized prediction models to optimize selection of treatment

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Precision medicine in type 2 Diabetes: Clinical markers of insulin resistance are associated with altered short- A nd long-term glycemic response to DPP-4 inhibitor therapy

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jones, A. G., Lonergan, M., Henley, W. E., Pearson, E. R., Hattersley, A. T., & Shields, B. M. (2016). Should studies of diabetes treatment stratification correct for baseline HbA1c? PLoS ONE, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152428

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

47%

Researcher 5

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 15

79%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

11%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

5%

Social Sciences 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0