Oral antibiotic step-down therapy for nonstaphylococcal gram-positive bloodstream infections

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Bloodstream infections traditionally are treated with intravenous (IV) therapy. This study's purpose is to evaluate if oral step-down therapy is noninferior to IV therapy for gram-positive bloodstream infections (GP-BSIs). This retrospective cohort study included patients who received IV therapy and those who received oral step-down therapy for a nonstaphylococcal GP-BSI from 2017 to 2019. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of 90-day all-cause mortality and clinical failure. A total of 308 patients were included (n = 94, oral; n = 214, IV). The oral step-down group had a lower incidence of 90-day clinical failure (9% vs 14%; P < 0.001). The IV group had a longer hospital stay (4 vs 6 days, P < 0.001); however, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Bivariate analysis found no predictors of 90-day clinical failure. Oral step-down therapy was found to be noninferior to IV therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gandhi, K., Wrzesinski, M., Bunnell, K., & Gibble, A. (2023). Oral antibiotic step-down therapy for nonstaphylococcal gram-positive bloodstream infections. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 107(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116068

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free