COVID-19, uncertainty, and moral experiments

4Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pandemics like COVID-19 confront us with decisions about life and death that come with great uncertainty, factual as well as moral. How should policy makers deal with such uncertainty? We suggest that rather than to deliberate until they have found the right course of action, they better do moral experiments that generate relevant experiences to enable more reliable moral evaluations and rational decisions.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Moral testimony and moral epistemology

318Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom?

282Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The COVID-19 pandemic and the Swedish strategy: Epidemiology and postmodernism

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Understanding value change

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tacit social experimentation with digital technologies during the Covid-19 crisis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pragmatism and Moral Objectivity

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klenk, M., & Van de Poel, I. (2021). COVID-19, uncertainty, and moral experiments. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-020-00360-9

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

50%

Psychology 2

25%

Philosophy 1

13%

Design 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0