Cooperation is unaffected by the threat of severe adverse events in public goods games

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the context of a one-shot public goods game with a large group size and a low marginal per capita return, we study if and how cooperation is affected by the presence of environmental risk – defined as an exogenous stochastic process that generates a severe adverse event with a very small probability – and by the correlation of such risk among the group members. More specifically, we run an online experiment to investigate the effect of a risk that is independent across group members, a risk that is positively correlated among group members, and a risk that is negatively correlated among group members on cooperation. We find that neither the presence nor the correlation of risk significantly affects individual contributions.

References Powered by Scopus

Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty

10004Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation

6790Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Five rules for the evolution of cooperation

4350Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Analyzing reciprocity dynamics in supply chains of public goods: a stochastic evolutionary game approach

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Increased cooperation in stochastic social dilemmas: Can it be explained by risk sharing?

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring the attitude towards a European public budget: A cross-country experiment

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bilancini, E., Boncinelli, L., Nardi, C., & Pizziol, V. (2024). Cooperation is unaffected by the threat of severe adverse events in public goods games. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics , 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102145

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

40%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

50%

Decision Sciences 1

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free