Scientific Representation, Denotation, and Fictional Entities

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I critically review RIG Hughes’ Denotation-Demonstration-Interpretation account of scientific representation, focusing in particular on the representation of fictional entities in science. I find the original account lacking, but argue that it can be extended in suitable ways. In particular I argue that an extension of this account that weakens the denotation and interpretation conditions can accommodate fictions. This extension also reveals the essential deflationary nature of scientific representation, by bringing into relief the functional roles of denotation and interpretation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suárez, M. (2015). Scientific Representation, Denotation, and Fictional Entities. In European Studies in Philosophy of Science (Vol. 1, pp. 331–341). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23015-3_25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free