Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication

20Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: We sought to assess self-rated importance of the medical interview to clinical practice and competence in physician-patient communication among new internal medicine faculty at an academic medical center. Methods: Since 2001, new internal medicine faculty at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (Rochester, Minnesota) have completed a survey on physician-patient communication. The survey asks the new faculty to rate their overall competence in medical interviewing, the importance of the medical interview to their practice, their confidence and adequacy of previous training in handling eight frequently encountered challenging communication scenarios, and whether they would benefit from additional communication training. Results: Between 2001 and 2004, 75 general internists and internal medicine subspecialists were appointed to the faculty, and of these, 58 (77%) completed the survey. The faculty rated (on a 10-point scale) the importance of the medical interview higher than their competence in interviewing; this difference was significant (average ± SD, 9.4 ± 1.0 vs 7.7 ± 1.2, P < .001). Similar results were obtained by sex, age, specialty, years since residency or fellowship training, and perceived benefit of training. Experienced faculty rated their competence in medical interviewing and the importance of the medical interview higher than recent graduates (ie, less than one year since training). For each challenging communication scenario, the new faculty rated the adequacy of their previous training in handling the scenario relatively low. A majority (57%) said they would benefit from additional communication training. Conclusion: Although new internal medicine faculty rate high the importance of the medical interview, they rate their competence and adequacy of previous training in medical interviewing relatively low, and many indicate that they would benefit from additional communication training. These results should encourage academic medical centers to make curricula in physician-patient communication available to their faculty members because many of them not only care for patients, but also teach clinical skills, including communication skills, to trainees. © 2006 Mueller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physician charter

1687Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters

909Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Communication patterns of primary care physicians

871Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessing and managing all aspects of migraine: Migraine attacks, migraine-related functional impairment, common comorbidities, and quality of life

209Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of using standardized patients or peer role play on ratings of undergraduate communication training: A randomized controlled trial

139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Incorporating professionalism into medical education: The Mayo Clinic experience

84Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mueller, P. S., Barrier, P. A., Call, T. G., Duncan, A. K., Hurley, D. L., Multari, A., … Li, J. T. C. (2006). Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication. BMC Medical Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-30

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

64%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

53%

Social Sciences 6

35%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

6%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free