This place looks familiar-how navigators distinguish places with ambiguous landmark objects when learning novel routes

19Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present two experiments investigating how navigators deal with ambiguous landmark information when learning unfamiliar routes. In the experiments we presented landmark objects repeatedly along a route, which allowed us to manipulate how informative single landmarks were (1) about the navigators' location along the route and (2) about the action navigators had to take at that location. Experiment 1 demonstrated that reducing location informativeness alone did not affect route learning performance. While reducing both location and action informativeness led to decreased route learning performance, participants still performed well above chance level. This demonstrates that they used other information than just the identity of landmark objects at their current position to disambiguate their location along the route. To investigate how navigators distinguish between visually identical intersections, we systematically manipulated the identity of landmark objects and the actions required at preceding intersections in Experiment 2. Results suggest that the direction of turn at the preceding intersections was sufficient to tell two otherwise identical intersections apart. Together, results from Experiments 1 and 2 suggest that route knowledge is more complex than simple stimulus-response associations and that neighboring places are tightly linked. These links not only encompass sequence information but also directional information which is used to identify the correct direction of travel at subsequent locations, but can also be used for self-localization.

Figures

  • TABLE 1 | Manipulation of the two dimensions location and action of landmark informativeness (Stankiewicz and Kalia, 2007) at the three types of intersections used in Experiment 1.
  • FIGURE 1 | Left: The 18 landmark objects used in the routes; Middle: Schematic drawing of the different direction route; Right: Table summarizing the same direction and the different direction route in detail. Int#: Number of intersection; Turn: Direction of turn left (L), right (R), straight (S); Unique: Unique (U), or non-unique (Non-U) object at intersection; Route: Two route conditions; Same: Direction of turn is the same for pairs of non-unique intersections; Diff: Direction of turn is different for pairs of non-unique intersections.
  • FIGURE 2 | (A) Screenshot taken at an intersection. The landmark object associated with that intersection is the picture of a football suspended from the ceiling; (B) Non-unique same direction intersections; the route continues in the same direction at the intersections with the same landmark object; (C) Non-unique different direction intersection; the route continues in the different direction at the intersections with the same landmark object.
  • FIGURE 3 | Top row: Performance for unique and non-unique intersection in the same direction route (left) and the different direction route (right). Lower row: Performance as a function of serial position for the same direction route (left) and the different direction route (right). For the analysis, intersections were classified as early, middle, or late along the route.
  • FIGURE 4 | Left: Schematic drawing of the route and example of unique predecessor (green) and non-unique predecessor intersections (red). Unique predecessor intersections are preceded by intersections with different landmark objects, while non-unique predecessor intersections are preceded by intersections with the same landmark object. The only way to disambiguate the two non-unique predecessor intersections is by taking into account the movement direction at the preceding intersections; Right: Table describing the route in detail. Int#: Number of intersection; Turn: Direction of turn left (L), right (R), straight (S); LM: Landmark objects, same letters indicating same object; Predec: Predecessor object unique (U) or non-unique (Non-U).
  • FIGURE 5 | Left: Participants’ performance in the training phase across the six experimental sessions; Right: Performance in the test phase for the unique predecessor and the non-unique predecessor trials for intersections in the initial, middle or final portion of the route.

References Powered by Scopus

Conflict monitoring and cognitive control

5748Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments

1461Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Selective neural representation of objects rellevant for navigation

313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Virtual environments as memory training devices in navigational tasks for older adults

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Qualitative differences in memory for vista and environmental spaces are caused by opaque borders, not movement or successive presentation

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ageing- and dementia-friendly design: theory and evidence from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology and environmental psychology can contribute to design guidelines that minimise spatial disorientation

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strickrodt, M., O’Malley, M., & Wiener, J. M. (2015). This place looks familiar-how navigators distinguish places with ambiguous landmark objects when learning novel routes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01936

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

55%

Researcher 8

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 10

42%

Computer Science 7

29%

Neuroscience 4

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0