The determination of drag in front crawl swimming

104Citations
Citations of this article
175Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The measurement of drag while swimming (i.e. active drag) is a controversial issue. Therefore, in a group of six elite swimmers two active drag measurement methods were compared to assess whether both measure the same retarding force during swimming. In method 1 push-off forces are measured directly using the system to measure active drag (MAD-system). In method 2 (the velocity perturbation method, VPM) drag is estimated from the difference in swimming speed when subjects swim twice at maximal effort (assuming equal power output and assuming a quadratic drag-speed relationship): once swimming free, and once swimming with a hydrodynamic body attached that created a known additional resistance. The average drag for the VPM tests (53.2N) was statistically significant and different from the active drag for the MAD-test (66.9N), paired Student's t-test: 2.484, 12 DF, p=0.029. A post hoc analysis was performed to assess whether the two methods measure a different phenomenon. Based on the drag speed curve obtained with the MAD-system, the VPM-data were re-examined. For diverging drag determinations the assumption of equal power output of the 'free' trial (swimming free) vs. the towing trial (swimming with hydrodynamic buoy) appeared to be violated. The regression of the relative difference in force (MAD vs. VPM) on the relative difference in power (swimming free vs. swimming with hydrodynamic body) was: %Δdrag=1. 898×%Δpower -4.498, r 2=0.88. This suggests that the major part of the difference in active drag values is due to a non-equal power output in the 'free' relative towing trial during the VPM-test. The simulation of the violation of the equal power output assumption and the calculation of the effect of an other than quadratic drag-speed relationship corroborated the tentative conclusion that both methods measure essentially the same phenomenon and that active drag differences can be explained by a violation of test assumptions. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

Active drag, useful mechanical power output and hydrodynamic force coefficient in different swimming strokes at maximal velocity

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Energetics of swimming in man

157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Active drag related to velocity in male and female swimmers

144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Energetics and biomechanics as determining factors of swimming performance: Updating the state of the art

240Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biomechanical aspects of peak performance in human swimming

115Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The influence of stroke mechanics into energy cost of elite swimmers

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toussaint, H. M., Roos, P. E., & Kolmogorov, S. (2004). The determination of drag in front crawl swimming. Journal of Biomechanics, 37(11), 1655–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.020

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 61

56%

Professor / Associate Prof. 18

17%

Researcher 16

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 13

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Sports and Recreations 80

70%

Engineering 17

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

10%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0