To date a one- or a two-dimensional model (coordination/condition) for the eight items of the German Motor Test 6-18 (Bös et al., 2009) has not been confirmed. Probabilistic (mixed-Rasch modeling) and classic (confirmatory factor analysis) models are used to test whether the recommended norm-categorizations or alternative categories are empirically valid. Using a cross-validation-design, two samples of 9- to 10-year-olds (N₁ = 1495, N₂ = 1357; 49.2 % female) were analyzed regarding the norm-quintiles, z-normalized norm-performance-classes, and t-transformed standard scores of the empirical data (eT-categories). This study could not show the construct validity for the two norm-categorizations published. Analyses of the eT-categories yielded a one-class-solution (mixed-Rasch modeling) if two items were excluded: “stand and reach” owing to theoretical assumptions and “balancing backward” because of local model violations. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the factorial validity. Thus homogeneity in a one-dimensional motor scale was shown for 9- to 10-year-olds. The six homogeneous items comprise a motor-/fitness-score, which can be interpreted validly in assessments of motor ability. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
CITATION STYLE
Utesch, T., Strauss, B., Tietjens, M., Büsch, D., Ghanbari, M.-C., & Seidel, I. (2015). Die Überprüfung der Konstruktvalidität des Deutschen Motorik-Tests 6-18 für 9- bis 10-Jährige. [Assessment of the construct validity of the German motor test 6-18 for 9- to 10-year-olds.]. Zeitschrift Für Sportpsychologie, 22(2), 77–90.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.