Allergen false-detection using official bioinformatic algorithms

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Bioinformatic amino acid sequence searches are used, in part, to assess the potential allergenic risk of newly expressed proteins in genetically engineered crops. Previous work has demonstrated that the searches required by government regulatory agencies falsely implicate many proteins from rarely allergenic crops as an allergenic risk. However, many proteins are found in crops at concentrations that may be insufficient to cause allergy. Here we used a recently developed set of high-abundance non-allergenic proteins to determine the false-positive rates for several algorithms required by regulatory bodies, and also for an alternative 1:1 FASTA approach previously found to be equally sensitive to the official sliding-window method, but far more selective. The current investigation confirms these earlier findings while addressing dietary exposure.

References Powered by Scopus

An introduction to sequence similarity ("homology") searching

641Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidance on allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants

161Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Food Allergens: Is There a Correlation between Stability to Digestion and Allergenicity?

123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evidence-based regulations for bioinformatic prediction of allergen cross-reactivity are needed

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

History of safe exposure and bioinformatic assessment of phosphomannose-isomerase (PMI) for allergenic risk

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Food Protein Digestomics

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herman, R. A., & Song, P. (2020). Allergen false-detection using official bioinformatic algorithms. GM Crops and Food, 11(2), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2019.1709021

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

33%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

33%

Computer Science 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0