Landmark superimposition for taxonomic identification

29Citations
Citations of this article
172Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The identification of organisms is a time-consuming task even for highly specialized researchers. Many ways to accelerate the identification process have been devised - from pictorial keys to automatic, machine identification - with different degrees of success. This paper explores landmark configurations as an aid to taxonomic identification. The basic hypothesis rests on the analogy between human fingerprints and organism landmark configuration. Translated into biological terms, it asks whether individual landmark configurations can be used as diagnostic characteristics for species identification. Water mites of the genus Torrenticola were used as test organisms. The results show that identification can be made simpler through the use of landmark configurations. © 2004 The Linnean Society of London.

References Powered by Scopus

Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks

3489Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’

1714Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A revolution morphometrics

1703Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The exchangeability of shape

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Subjective visual evaluation vs. traditional and geometric morphometrics in species delimitation: A comparison of moth genitalia

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modern Morphometrics of medically important insects

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Becerra, J. M., & Valdecasas, A. G. (2004). Landmark superimposition for taxonomic identification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 81(2), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2003.00286.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 74

51%

Researcher 45

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 25

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122

80%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 15

10%

Environmental Science 11

7%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free