Genome-edited livestock: Ethics and social acceptance

21Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

• With the advent of robust genome editing tools, strains of cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, and fowls with no transgenes have been bred. • Food products derived from genome-edited livestock are expected to enter the market soon after the safety is confirmed in a country. However, previous controversy over genetically modified (GM) animals and cloned animals suggests that many people will be unlikely to accept the products from genome-edited animals. • The social acceptance of such farm animal products would depend on the major premise that animal breeding by genome editing is performed after due considerations with regard to people's sense of ethics as well as animal welfare.

References Powered by Scopus

Double muscling in cattle due to mutations in the myostatin gene

1694Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line

1559Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Long-term control of HIV by CCR5 delta32/delta32 stem-cell transplantation

1538Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Bioethical issues in genome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 technology

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: A systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improvements in Gene Editing Technology Boost Its Applications in Livestock

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ishii, T. (2017). Genome-edited livestock: Ethics and social acceptance. Animal Frontiers, 7(2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0115

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

65%

Researcher 11

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33

62%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 13

25%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 5

9%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 15

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free