Faster and better CRISPR guide RNA design with the Crackling method

  • Bradford J
  • Chappell T
  • Perrin D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The design of CRISPR-Cas9 guide RNAs is not trivial, and is a computationally demanding task. Design tools need to identify target sequences that will maximise the likelihood of obtaining the desired cut, whilst minimising off-target risk. There is a need for a tool that can meet both objectives while remaining practical to use on large genomes. Here, we present Crackling, a new method that is more suitable for meeting these objectives. We test its performance on 12 genomes and on data from validation studies. Crackling maximises guide efficiency by combining multiple scoring approaches. On experimental data, the guides it selects are better than those selected by others. It also incorporates Inverted Signature Slice Lists (ISSL) for faster off-target scoring. ISSL provides a gain of an order of magnitude in speed, while preserving the same level of accuracy. Overall, this makes Crackling a faster and better method to design guide RNAs at scale. Crackling is available at https://github.com/bmdslab/Crackling under the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) 3-Clause license.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bradford, J., Chappell, T., & Perrin, D. (2020). Faster and better CRISPR guide RNA design with the Crackling method. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.14.950261

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Researcher 4

44%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

50%

Computer Science 3

30%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free