Decisions to Protect Children: A Decision Making Ecology

44Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Decisions in child protection and child welfare, for example removal decisions, are made under uncertainty. This chapter provides an overview of decision making theory and research focused on improving decision making in child welfare, and the limitations of our current approaches. The framework developed in the chapter, The Decision Making Ecology (DME) and General Assessment and Decision Making (GADM) model considers child welfare decisions to be a function of case (e.g., type and severity of maltreatment, risk, poverty), decision maker (e.g., experience, values), organizational (e.g., policy, workload, resources), and external characteristics (e.g., critical events, funding). Research has shown that although workers attend to case information similarly to arrive at an assessment, the factors determining their willingness to take action vary; the General Assessment and Decision Making (GADM). Workers, supervisors, administrators, and judges reach individual decision thresholds where assessment information resulting in action in combination with competing views of consequences, including disparities. The chapter concludes with applications of the framework and prospects for improving decision making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fluke, J. D., Baumann, D. J., Dalgleish, L. I., & Kern, H. D. (2014). Decisions to Protect Children: A Decision Making Ecology. In Child Maltreatment: Contemporary Issues in Research and Policy (Vol. 2, pp. 463–476). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7208-3_25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free