Tactile priming modulates the activation of the fronto-parietal circuit during tactile angle match and non-match processing: An fMRI study

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The repetition of a stimulus task reduces the neural activity within certain cortical regions responsible for working memory (WM) processing. Although previous evidence has shown that repeated vibrotactile stimuli reduce the activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, whether the repeated tactile spatial stimuli triggered the priming effect correlated with the same cortical region remains unclear. Therefore, we used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a delayed match-to-sample task to investigate the contributions of the priming effect to tactile spatial WM processing. Fourteen healthy volunteers were asked to encode three tactile angle stimuli during the encoding phase and one tactile angle stimulus during the recognition phase. Then, they answered whether the last angle stimulus was presented during the encoding phase. As expected, both the Match and Non-Match tasks activated a similar cerebral network. The critical new finding was decreased brain activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and bilateral medial frontal gyri (mFG) for the match task compared to the Non-Match task. Therefore, we suggest that the tactile priming engaged repetition suppression mechanisms during tactile angle matching, and this process decreased the activation of the fronto-parietal circuit, including IFG, mFG and PPC.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, J., Yu, Y., Kunita, A., Huang, Q., Wu, J., Sawamoto, N., & Fukuyama, H. (2014). Tactile priming modulates the activation of the fronto-parietal circuit during tactile angle match and non-match processing: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00926

Readers over time

‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

54%

Researcher 5

38%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

43%

Neuroscience 4

29%

Engineering 2

14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0