On the numerics and correlation of scratch testing

52Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A numerical strategy based on the finite element method and intended for an accurate analysis of the Scratch test is presented. For simplicity, but not out of necessity, the material was described by classical von Mises elastoplasticity utilizing large deformation theory. Based on this strategy numerous results are presented and correlation of scratch properties is discussed within the framework of theory for indentation testing. Furthermore, the existence of a representative plastic strain in the spirit of Tabor was studied. The investigation also concerns details regarding frictional effects, normal vs. tangential scratch hardness, similarities and differences between indentation and scratch test characteristics as well as details regarding the behavior of local field variables at scratching.

References Powered by Scopus

A phenomenological theory for strain gradient effects in plasticity

1428Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Computational modeling of the forward and reverse problems in instrumented sharp indentation

1392Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The correlation of indentation experiments

1226Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Scratch testing of metals and polymers: Experiments and numerics

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of mechanical properties and surface friction on elasto-plastic sliding contact

92Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scratch-tip-size effect and change of friction coefficient in nano / micro scratch tests using XFEM

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wredenberg, F., & Larsson, P. L. (2007). On the numerics and correlation of scratch testing. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 2(3), 573–594. https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2007.2.573

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Researcher 4

36%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

60%

Physics and Astronomy 2

20%

Materials Science 2

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free