The impact of bone marrow sparing on organs at risk dose for cervical cancer: a Pareto front analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and purpose: To quantify the increase in bladder and rectum dose of a bone marrow sparing (BMS) VMAT strategy for primary treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Materials and methods: Twenty patients with stage IB-IVA cervical cancer were selected for this study. The whole Pelvic Bones (PB) was taken as substitute for bone marrow. For every patient, Pareto-optimal plans were generated to explore the trade-off between rectum, bladder, and PB mean dose. The PB mean dose was decreased in steps of 1 Gy. For each step, the increase in rectum and bladder mean dose was quantified. The increase in mean dose of other OAR compared to no BMS was constrained to 1 Gy. Results: In total, 931 plans of 19 evaluable patients were analyzed. The average [range] mean dose of PB without BMS was 22.8 [20.7-26.2] Gy. When maximum BMS was applied, the average reduction in mean PB dose was 5.4 [3.0-6.8] Gy resulting in an average mean PB dose of 17.5 [15.8-19.8] Gy. For <1 Gy increase in both the bladder and the rectum mean dose, the PB mean dose could be decreased by >2 Gy, >3 Gy, >4 Gy, and >5 Gy for 19/19, 13/19, 5/19, and 1/19 patients, respectively. Conclusion: Based on the comprehensive three-dimensional Pareto front analysis, we conclude that 2-5 Gy BMS can be implemented without a clinically relevant increase in mean dose to other OAR. If BMS is too dominant, it results in a large increase in mean dose to other OAR. Therefore, we recommend implementing moderate BMS for the treatment of LACC patients with VMAT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuipers, S., Godart, J., Corbeau, A., Sharfo, A. W., Breedveld, S., Mens, J. W., … Hoogeman, M. (2023). The impact of bone marrow sparing on organs at risk dose for cervical cancer: a Pareto front analysis. Frontiers in Oncology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1138433

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free