Addressing persistent evidence gaps in cardiovascular sex differences research – the potential of clinical care data

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Women have historically been underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials, resulting in a lack of sex-specific data. This is especially problematic in two situations, namely those where diseases manifest differently in women and men and those where biological differences between the sexes might affect the efficacy and/or safety of medication. There is therefore a pressing need for datasets with proper representation of women to address questions related to these situations. Clinical care data could fit this bill nicely because of their unique broad scope across both patient groups and clinical measures. This perspective piece presents the potential of clinical care data in sex differences research and discusses current challenges clinical care data-based research faces. It also suggests strategies to reduce the effect of these limitations, and explores whether clinical care data alone will be sufficient to close evidence gaps or whether a more comprehensive approach is needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bots, S. H., Onland-Moret, N. C., & den Ruijter, H. M. (2022). Addressing persistent evidence gaps in cardiovascular sex differences research – the potential of clinical care data. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2022.1006425

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free