Social science in a water observing system

44Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We set forth an argument for the integration of social science research with natural science and engineering research in major research infrastructure investments addressing water science. A program of integrated observation of water resources offers great opportunities to address several environmental "grand challenges" identified by the National Research Council, including climate variability, institutions and resource use, and land use dynamics, and their importance for hydrologic forecasting. We argue that such a program has the potential to advance both water science and the contributing disciplines. However, to realize this potential, it is essential to recognize that social science requires critical infrastructure funding on the scale of advanced research facilities in the natural sciences and engineering. Copyright 2009 by the American Geophysical Union.

References Powered by Scopus

Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

11514Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social influence: Compliance and conformity

3904Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Climate change: Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?

3509Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world

495Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Water security: Research challenges and opportunities

434Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Runoff prediction in ungauged basins: Synthesis across processes, places and scales

375Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Braden, J. B., Brown, D. G., Dozier, J., Gober, P., Hughes, S. M., Maidment, D. R., … Werner, C. M. (2009). Social science in a water observing system. Water Resources Research, 45(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 60

58%

Researcher 20

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 18

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 40

50%

Social Sciences 14

18%

Engineering 14

18%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 12

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free