Remaking settlements for sustainability: The Simpler Way

14Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In view of the global resource and ecological situation, per-capita resource consumption rates in the rich world probably need to be reduced by 90%. This can only be done if there is a "de-growth" transition to some kind of Simpler Way centered on mostly small, highly self-sufficient and self-governing communities in control of local economies within a culture that is not focused on material wealth. It is not surprising that the viability of such a vision is typically regarded as implausible. The aim of this study is to show that normal outer city suburbs could be restructured along the lines required to cut global impacts by the necessary amount, while improving the quality of life. Data on typical Australian consumption rates, food production yields, suburban geographies, etc. is used to estimate the achievable reductions. The theoretical conclusion that such reductions could be made aligns with a study of the Dancing Rabbit Eco-village in northeast Missouri. Heavy cuts in resource consumption cannot be made without extreme change in economic, political, settlement and cultural systems.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

52Citations
118Readers
42Citations
73Readers
Get full text
38Citations
106Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

689Citations
1331Readers

This article is free to access.

65Citations
295Readers

This article is free to access.

44Citations
191Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trainer, T. (2019). Remaking settlements for sustainability: The Simpler Way. Journal of Political Ecology, 26(1), 202–223. https://doi.org/10.2458/V26I1.22972

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

58%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

12%

Researcher 3

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 9

43%

Engineering 5

24%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

19%

Environmental Science 3

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 17

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0