Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002-2010

17Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The Services Sector, as defined by the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA), is comprised of a diverse industry mix and its workers face a variety of occupational exposures and hazards. The objective of this study was to identify high-risk industry groups within the Services Sector for prevention targeting. Methods: Compensable Washington State workers' compensation claims from the Services Sector from 2002 through 2010 were analyzed. A "prevention index" (PI), the average of the rank orders of claim count and claim incidence rate, was used to rank 87 Services Sector industry groups by seven injury types: Work- Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs), Fall to Lower Level, Fall on Same Level, Struck By/Against, Caught In/Under/Between, Motor Vehicle, and Overexertion. In the PI rankings, industry groups with high injury burdens appear higher ranked than industry groups with low counts or low rates of injury, indicating a need for prioritizing injury prevention efforts in these groups. Results: In the Services Sector, these 7 injury types account for 84% of compensable claims in WA. The industry groups highest ranked by PI across the injury types included: Services to Buildings and Dwellings; Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support; and Waste Collection. WMSDs had the highest compensable claims rates. Conclusions: Services is a large sector of the economy, and the substantial number, rate, and cost of occupational injuries within this sector should be addressed. Several Services Sector industry groups are at high risk for a variety of occupational injuries. Using a PI to rank industry groups based on their injury risk provides information with which to guide prevention efforts.

References Powered by Scopus

Work organization, job insecurity, and occupational health disparities

287Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Occupational injury disparities in the US hotel industry

112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Costs of occupational injury and illness across industries

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A case-crossover study of heat exposure and injury risk among outdoor construction workers in Washington state

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relationships between job organisational factors, biomechanical and psychosocial exposures

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of methods for using workers’ compensation data for surveillance and prevention of occupational injuries among State-insured private employers in Ohio

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, N. J., Bonauto, D. K., & Adams, D. (2014, November 9). Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002-2010. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-014-0037-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

66%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

13%

Researcher 4

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

32%

Social Sciences 6

24%

Engineering 6

24%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free