The effects of logistics competency on performance

  • Kuo-Chung Shang
  • Peter B. Marlow
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Logistics and supply chain management has been elevated to a strategic level whereby firms can simultaneously achieve differentiation and low cost for sustained competitive advantage. Empirical studies have often concentrated on logistics management in developed Western countries, displaying a bias towards the USA. This study applies the competency approach to explore logistics in Taiwan. A survey of 1,200 manufacturing firms was undertaken in order to examine the relationships between logistics competency, logistics performance, and financial performance, using exploratory factor analysis and the structural equation modelling technique. Four logistics competencies, namely, integration and knowledge competency, customer focused logistics competency, measurement competency, and agility competency were identified. The research findings revealed that (1) logistics competency was significantly related to logistics performance but not significantly associated with financial performance, and (2) logistics performance was positively associated with financial performance. These findings also implied that logistics competency has an indirect effect on financial performance through logistics performance. This finding confirmed the "world-class" logistics competencies (i.e. positioning, integration, agility, and measurement) as identified by MSUGLRT (1995). In addition, it suggests that logistics competency in a huge geographic area such as America can have the same effect in a smaller geographic area such as Taiwan.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuo-Chung Shang, & Peter B. Marlow. (2007). The effects of logistics competency on performance. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 5(2), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2007.5.2.003

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 10

56%

Engineering 4

22%

Social Sciences 2

11%

Arts and Humanities 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0