A human biomonitoring (HBM) Global Registry Framework: Further advancement of HBM research following the FAIR principles

19Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Data generated by the rapidly evolving human biomonitoring (HBM) programmes are providing invaluable opportunities to support and advance regulatory risk assessment and management of chemicals in occupational and environmental health domains. However, heterogeneity across studies, in terms of design, terminology, biomarker nomenclature, and data formats, limits our capacity to compare and integrate data sets retrospectively (reuse). Registration of HBM studies is common for clinical trials; however, the study designs and resulting data collections cannot be traced easily. We argue that an HBM Global Registry Framework (HBM GRF) could be the solution to several of challenges hampering the (re)use of HBM (meta)data. The aim is to develop a global, host-independent HBM registry framework based on the use of harmonised open-access protocol templates from designing, undertaking of an HBM study to the use and possible reuse of the resulting HBM (meta)data. This framework should apply FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) principles as a core data management strategy to enable the (re)use of HBM (meta)data to its full potential through the data value chain. Moreover, we believe that implementation of FAIR principles is a fundamental enabler for digital transformation within environmental health. The HBM GRF would encompass internationally harmonised and agreed open access templates for HBM study protocols, structured web-based functionalities to deposit, find, and access harmonised protocols of HBM studies. Registration of HBM studies using the HBM GRF is anticipated to increase FAIRness of the resulting (meta)data. It is also considered that harmonisation of existing data sets could be performed retrospectively. As a consequence, data wrangling activities to make data ready for analysis will be minimised. In addition, this framework would enable the HBM (inter)national community to trace new HBM studies already in the planning phase and their results once finalised. The HBM GRF could also serve as a platform enhancing communication between scientists, risk assessors, and risk managers/policy makers. The planned European Partnership for the Assessment of Risk from Chemicals (PARC) work along these lines, based on the experience obtained in previous joint European initiatives. Therefore, PARC could very well bring a first demonstration of first essential functionalities within the development of the HBM GRF.

References Powered by Scopus

Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

10291Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

German Environmental Survey 1998 (GerES III): Environmental pollutants in the urine of the German population

233Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An overview of human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals in the Canadian Health Measures Survey: 2007–2019

213Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Developing human biomonitoring as a 21st century toolbox within the European exposure science strategy 2020–2030

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advancing exposure data analytics and repositories as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020–2030

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The European exposure science strategy 2020–2030

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zare Jeddi, M., Virgolino, A., Fantke, P., Hopf, N. B., Galea, K. S., Remy, S., … Bessems, J. (2021, September 1). A human biomonitoring (HBM) Global Registry Framework: Further advancement of HBM research following the FAIR principles. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. Elsevier GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113826

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

42%

Researcher 13

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 9

39%

Computer Science 6

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

17%

Engineering 4

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 36

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free