The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research

197Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into 2 sets, the "ARRIVE Essential 10,"which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the "Recommended Set,"which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts, and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.

References Powered by Scopus

Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

10061Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving bioscience research reporting: The arrive guidelines for reporting animal research

5690Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

2146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Intranasal infection of ferrets with sars-cov-2 as a model for asymptomatic human infection

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acute ischemic stroke triggers a cellular senescence-associated secretory phenotype

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri‐implant bone defects

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Percie Du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., … Würbel, H. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. BMC Veterinary Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02451-y

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

63%

Researcher 6

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 7

29%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

25%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 4

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free