Unmet healthcare needs and health inequalities in people with spinal cord injury: a direct regression inequality decomposition

9Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Inequality in health is a prevalent and growing concern among countries where people with disabilities are disproportionately affected. Unmet healthcare needs explain a large part of the observed inequalities between and within countries; however, there are other causes, many non-modifiable, that also play a role. Aim: This article explores the difference in health across income levels in populations with spinal cord injury (SCI). SCI is of special interest in the study of health systems, as it is an irreversible, long-term health condition that combines a high level of impairment with subsequent comorbidities. Methods: We estimated the importance of modifiable and non-modifiable factors that explain health inequalities through a direct regression approach. We used two health outcomes: years living with the injury and a comorbidity index. Data come from the International Spinal Cord Injury Survey (InSCI), which has individual data on people with SCI in 22 countries around the world. Due to the heterogeneity of the data, the results were estimated country by country. Results: On average, the results exhibit a prevalence of pro-rich inequalities, i.e., better health outcomes are more likely observed among high-income groups. For the years living with the injury, the inequality is mostly explained by non-modifiable factors, like the age at the time of the injury. In contrast, for the comorbidity index, inequality is mostly explained by unmet healthcare needs and the cause of the injury, which are modifiable factors. Conclusions: A significant portion of health inequalities is explained by modifiable factors like unmet healthcare needs or the type of accident. This result is prevalent in low, middle, and high-income countries, with pervasive effects for vulnerable populations like people with SCI, who, at the same time are highly dependent on the health system. To reduce inequity, it is important not only to address problems from public health but from inequalities of opportunities, risks, and income in the population. Highlights: • Better health status is evident among high-income groups, which is reflected in pro-rich inequalities. • Age at the time of the injury is the most important factor to explain inequalities in years living with the injury. • Unmet health care needs are the most important factor to explain inequalities in comorbidities. • The inequality in health varies by country dependent upon socioeconomic factors.

References Powered by Scopus

Updating and validating the charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries

4294Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social determinants of health inequalities

3455Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities

1319Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Improved Recovery of Complete Spinal Cord Transection by a Plasma-Modified Fibrillar Scaffold

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence of Subjective Unmet Mental Healthcare Needs, Barriers, and Socioeconomic Inequality among Adult Individuals with Physical, Visual, Hearing, and Speech Disabilities in West of Iran

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Association Between the Digital Divide and Health Inequalities Among Older Adults in China: Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oña, A., Athanasios, K., Tederko, P., Escorpizo, R., Arora, M., Sturm, C., … Barzallo, D. P. (2023). Unmet healthcare needs and health inequalities in people with spinal cord injury: a direct regression inequality decomposition. International Journal for Equity in Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01848-z

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

40%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

43%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

29%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Engineering 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0