The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and Validation

6.3kCitations
Citations of this article
2.7kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In Study 1, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was administered to 425 undergraduates. Analyses yielded a three component solution comprising (a) rumination, (b) magnification, and (c) helplessness. In Study 2, 30 undergraduate participants were classified as catastrophizers (n = 15) or noncatastrophizers (n = 15) on the basis of their PCS scores and participated in an cold pressor procedure. Catastrophizers reported significantly more negative pain-related thoughts, greater emotional distress, and greater pain intensity than noncatastrophizers. Study 3 examined the relation between PCS scores, negative pain-related thoughts, and distress in 28 individuals undergoing an aversive electrodiagnostic medical procedure. Catastrophizers reported more negative pain-related thoughts, more emotional distress, and more pain than noncatastrophizers. Study 4 examined the relation between the PCS and measures of depression, trait anxiety, negative affectivity, and fear of pain. Analyses revealed moderate correlations among these measures, but only the PCS contributed significant unique variance to the prediction of pain intensity.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A state of the art

3616Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain

1972Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: Current state of scientific evidence

1650Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and Validation. Psychological Assessment, 7(4), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250150300450600

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1048

71%

Researcher 248

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 126

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 49

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 574

38%

Psychology 537

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 285

19%

Neuroscience 112

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 7
References: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0