The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors

1.3kCitations
Citations of this article
642Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop measures of perceived social support specific to health-related eating and exercise behaviors. In Study I, specific supportive and nonsupportive behaviors were identified through interviews with 40 individuals making health-behavior changes. In Study II, items derived from the interviews were administered to 171 subjects. Support from family and friends was assessed separately for both diet and exercise habits. Meaningful factors were identified for each of the four scales, and some factors were similar for family and friend scales. Both test-retest and internal consistency reliabilities were acceptable, and six factors can be used as subscales. Social support scales were correlated with respective self-reported dietary and exercise habits, providing evidence of concurrent criterion-related validity. A measure of general social support was not related to the specific social support scales or to reported health habits. These scales are among the first measures of social support behaviors specific to dietary- and exercise-habit change. © 1987.

References Powered by Scopus

Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire

2013Citations
1752Readers
Get full text
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

1204Citations
1228Readers
Get full text
Get full text
708Citations
1314Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sallis, J. F., Grossman, R. M., Pinski, R. B., Patterson, T. L., & Nader, P. R. (1987). The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Preventive Medicine, 16(6), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(87)90022-3

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 280

66%

Researcher 70

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 64

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 86

27%

Social Sciences 85

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 78

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 67

21%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0